APHR urges Indonesia as ASEAN Chair to lead in improving human rights, democracy, climate protection in the region

APHR urges Indonesia as ASEAN Chair to lead in improving human rights, democracy, climate protection in the region

We, Southeast Asian parliamentarians from the ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR), are alarmed by the deteriorating human rights situation in the region,

Recognizing the unique and significant role of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to promote regional peace and stability through respect for justice and rule of law,

Underscoring with urgent concern the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Myanmar with over one-million people displaced since the coup on 1 February 2021;

Drawing urgent attention to the unabated crimes against humanity, war crimes, conflict-related sexual violence, impunity perpetrated by the armed forces of Myanmar’s military junta;

Noting with concern the increasing attacks against freedoms of expression, association, and assembly and the alarming shrinking civic space in Southeast Asia;

Recognizing that elections have become the tools of authoritarian leaders to consolidate their power undermining elections as one of the core pillars of democracy; 

Expressing continued concern over Hun Sen’s constant and intensified repression of the opposition, civil society activists, and independent media through intimidation, physical violence, and politically motivated prosecutions;

Concerned over the Cambodian government’s abuse of power to prevent opposition parties from contesting in the upcoming July 2023 Elections;

Recognizing the significant risks and challenges faced by parliamentarians and human rights defenders in Southeast Asia;

Highlighting the increasing intimidation and harassment that parliamentarians and human rights defenders received in association with their status or work in upholding human rights;

Noting the lack of adequate protection, including under the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, and the prevailing culture of impunity for perpetrators of abuses against human rights defenders; 

Raising concern over the persistent discrimination, persecution, and denial of basic rights based on faith, exemplified by the ongoing plight of the Rohingya community;

Highlighting the prevalence of problematic legislations, such as blasphemy laws, that fuel tensions and conflicts and undermine freedom of religion or belief;

Observing the alarming rise of hate speech, hate campaigns, and the divisive rhetoric propagated by influential figures, including religious leaders, politicians, and educators, which target ethnic and religious minorities, exacerbated by the influence of social media;

Acknowledging the high vulnerability of ASEAN nations to the adverse impacts of climate change, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and loss of biodiversity;

Noting that the  potential scale of devastation in ASEAN member states caused by the unmitigated carbon emission and rising global temperatures;

Recognizing the continuing dependence of most ASEAN states to fossil fuel and the slow progress in just energy transition;

Recognizing that gender inequalities exacerbate the the vulnerability of women to climate change impacts;

Noting the agreement in principle between ASEAN member states to admit Timor-Leste into ASEAN;

Building on Indonesia’s recent statement of support for Timor-Leste’s membership in ASEAN;

Do hereby agree to:

Urge Indonesia as Chair of ASEAN to take the lead in the region and mobilize all its member countries and ASEAN instrumentalities to take more proactive and decisive steps to address most urgent human rights concerns in the regions. Specifically:

In responding to the Myanmar Crisis

  • Initiate an inclusive review of the five-point consensus and make recommendations put forward by civil society organizations, including applying pressure to the United Nations Security Council to adopt a resolution on Myanmar under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. 
  • Liaise and coordinate with more vital pro-democracy allies and ASEAN dialogue partners such as the European Union, Canada, United States of America (USA), Australia, and New Zealand to counter Thailand talking with the Mekong River countries and China and India, and further express concern about Thailand’s ‘Track 1.5’ meetings.
  • Advocate for the immediate facilitation of cross-border assistance to meet the many growing needs of internally displaced people who urgently need food, shelter, water and medicine.
  • Declare that the junta sponsored ‘elections’ set to take place in 2024 in Myanmar are not legitimate and thus should not be endorsed nor considered free and fair.
  • Support calls from civil society organizations and ethnic revolution organizations for federalism and gender equality to be a strong pillar in Myanmar’s roadmap to freedom and democracy. Thus far, there has been a sincere lack of political will to discuss strategic women’s engagement. 
  • Recognize the suffering of Myanmar’s many ethnic people, including the long-persecuted Rohingya, who continue to face systematic violence. A comprehensive and coordinated approach rooted in humanitarian principles must be established to ensure that preserving their humanity is a collective approach.

In championing the restoration democratic rights of Cambodians

  • Condemn the Cambodian government’s efforts to undermine democratic institutions, including physical and legal violence towards human rights defenders, opposition members, and civil society,  as well as the disqualification of the opposition from contesting in the elections, and the banning of independent media outlet Voice of Democracy.
  • Pressure the Cambodian government to ensure an inclusive, free and fair electoral process, in full respect of human rights, including rights to freedom of assembly, association and expression for all political actors, civil society, and voters.
  • Urge Cambodia to unconditionally release all political prisoners from detention, put an end to all harassment and prosecution of political opponents, and to ensure full respect for human rights, including the right to a fair trial and full participation in the conduct of political affairs.
  • Call on ASEAN Member States and the international community to refuse to accord legitimacy to July elections and take stronger actions towards Hun Sen’s efforts to solidify his dictatorship.

In advancing for an ASEAN Regional Human Rights Defenders’ Mechanism 

  • Urge ASEAN and ASEAN Member States to adopt a zero-tolerance approach to the harassment and violent acts against human rights defenders and to take all necessary measures to promote and uphold the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders; 
  • Push ASEAN to work towards the development and implementation of a regional framework or mechanism on the protection of human rights defenders against all forms of violence, threats, retaliation, or any other arbitrary actions in association with their status or work, and to include such mechanism under the ASEAN Charter;
  • Urge ASEAN Member States to take legislative, judicial, administrative or other appropriate measures at national levels to facilitate the work of and to protect human rights defenders from any form of reprisals in association with their status or work as human rights defenders;
  • Encourage ASEAN to strengthen the mandate of ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights to provide emergency protection for human rights defenders and to regularly review the progress made by ASEAN Member States in implementing measures to protect human rights defenders, including through the establishment of a monitoring and reporting mechanism to assess the situation and identify areas for improvement.

In the protecting Freedom of Religion and Belief

  • Cease all violence and persecution against minority groups and release all prisoners of conscience who have been detained merely for peacefully expressing their beliefs.
  • Repeal or amend laws that infringe upon people’s freedom of religion and belief, including women and girls, ensuring compliance with international human rights standards.
  • Provide comprehensive remedies for victims of freedom of religion and belief violations and enhanced protection mechanisms for vulnerable groups at risk of victimization.
  • Encourage political leaders, religious leaders, and educators to actively promote peace, tolerance, and diversity, fostering social harmony in diverse ASEAN.
  • Support the establishment of an ASEAN mechanism to protect and advance freedom of religion and belief, setting standards, addressing abuses, and safeguarding individuals affected by these issues.

In addressing adverse impacts of Climate Change and Global Warming:

  • Mobilize ASEAN Member States to strengthen their commitment to the Paris agreement by enhancing their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in order keep the increase in the world’s temperatures to less than 1.5°C at the end of the century. In this way, we can attain a regional and global community where all, including future generations, are able to enjoy human rights without harm from climate change, pollution, deforestation, waste and environmental degradation.
  • Compel ASEAN member states to make just energy transition an  urgent priority of their governments by providing financial incentives to renewable energy systems and zero-emissions infrastructures and technologies in accordance with the objectives of the Paris agreements.
  • Advise ASEAN member states to promote investments in natural infrastructure and green spaces and prioritize government budget allocations on renewable energy, public transport, energy efficiency, electric vehicles, and other key areas supportive of a low carbon economy to avert potential damages from climate-related disasters.
  • Press ASEAN member states to strengthen efforts to enforce human-rights based protection of forests,  in particular  with respect to indigenous rights and customary land rights. 
  • Lead in developing regional mechanisms to assist member states to restore degraded forests to reactivate their capacities to regulate ecosystems.
  • Strengthen cooperation and enforce a transboundary integrated approach among member states to improve ocean management by sharing best practices, monitoring marine pollution, harmonizing policies, and implementing joint activities.
  • Urge ASEAN member states to commit to gender-responsive Climate Policies, plans, and programs at all levels ensuring equal access to resources, including inclusion to to climate finance initiatives;
  • Drive member countries in the region to develop gender-responsive adaptation measures that are responsive to address the specific needs of women and of other marginalized genders.

In the Inclusion of Timor Leste as member of ASEAN

  • Expedite the admission of Timor-Leste as a member of ASEAN.
Indonesia should set example on safeguarding digital rights ahead of elections, Southeast Asian MPs say

Indonesia should set example on safeguarding digital rights ahead of elections, Southeast Asian MPs say

JAKARTA — As the region’s largest democracy, Indonesia should lead the way in upholding human rights online, particularly ahead of the upcoming 2024 general elections, Southeast Asian lawmakers said today at the conclusion of a fact-finding mission on internet freedom in the country.

Indonesia has taken great strides in democratic reform following the fall of the authoritarian New Order regime 25 years ago, but we are concerned that if current trends of restrictions on freedom of speech and expression online continue unchecked, this important progress will be lost,” ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights member and Malaysian Member of Parliament Yuneswaran Ramaraj said today.

“The internet is now one of the places where citizens and voters exercise their right to freedom of speech the most; if these digital spaces are closed this poses a risk to the freeness and fairness of the upcoming elections,” continued Ramaraj.

During the fact-finding mission, current and former parliamentarians from Malaysia, the Philippines, and Timor-Leste went to Jakarta and met with civil society organizations, journalists, and technology companies and also made visits to the Ministry of Communication and Information, the General Election Commission (KPU) as well as the National Human Rights Commission (Komnas HAM). The mission culminated in a meeting with members of the Indonesian House of Representatives Commission I, which oversees communication and information.

One of the major findings of the mission is how the Electronic Information and Transaction (ITE) Law – particularly its articles on defamation – has been used by those in positions of power to criminalize and silence peaceful expressions of dissent. This can be seen in the ongoing prosecution of human rights defenders Haris Azhar and Fatia Maulidiyanti, who were reported under the ITE Law by Coordinating Minister for Maritime Affairs and Investment Luhut Panjaitan merely for discussing allegations of the minister’s involvement in mining activities in Papua in a Youtube video.

The ambiguous provisions in the ITE Law are clearly being misused and pose a great threat to meaningfully discussion of political opinions online, which is particularly concerning with elections on the horizon,” said APHR member and Timor-Leste member of parliament Elvina Sousa Carvalho. 

APHR joins Indonesian civil society in calling on the Indonesian government and House of Representatives to enact a comprehensive revision of the law, and for authorities to halt the use of the law pending the revision. Continued prosecutions under the ITE Law would call into question whether the upcoming elections are truly democratic,” continued Carvalho.

Representatives from civil society and media also expressed their concerns about the increased monitoring of social media content, as well as digital attacks against human rights defenders and media organizations. These threats to freedom of expression online have caused a chilling effect, creating an atmosphere in which internet users are inclined to self-censor themselves in order to avoid legal harassment or online intimidation.

Civil society organizations as well as Komnas HAM have engaged in efforts to safeguard a democratic digital ecosystem, including by fact-checking disinformation about the 2024 election, conducting training for young voters, as well as engaging with state actors. However, many respondents have expressed concerns that state institutions are not opening enough room for civil society and human rights groups to provide their inputs in regulations that affect freedom of speech and expression online.

Elections are not merely about what happens on one day in a voting booth,” said APHR member and former Philippines member of parliament Sarah Elago. “Elections should be a truly democratic process in which all members of society, especially the marginalized, feel comfortable to openly and peacefully express their views and have meaningful dialogues about the future of the country,” Elago added.

APHR therefore calls on the Indonesian government institutions to increase public participation in digital freedom-related policy making and setting measures to promote a healthy and informed online discourse during the election process. We also urge state institutions, such as KPU, Bawaslu, and Komnas HAM, to uphold democratic principles and likewise prevent any backsliding in democratic progress,” said Elago.

Indonesia has often been considered as one of the most democratic and human rights-respecting countries in Southeast Asia. Considering this, and the country’s position as ASEAN chair, Indonesia should continue to set an example and not turn back from the progress made during the past three decades,” said Ramaraj.

Click here to read this statement in Indonesian.

A 10-point plan to address our information crisis

A 10-point plan to address our information crisis

Presented by 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureates Maria Ressa and Dmitry Muratov at the Freedom of Expression Conference, Nobel Peace Center, Oslo 2 September 2022

We call for a world in which technology is built in service of humanity and where our global public square protects human rights above profits.

Right now, the huge potential of technology to advance our societies has been undermined by the business model and design of the dominant online platforms. But we remind all those in power that true human progress comes from harnessing technology to advance rights and freedoms for all, not sacrificing them for the wealth and power of a few.

We urge rights-respecting democracies to wake up to the existential threat of information ecosystems being distorted by a Big Tech business model fixated on harvesting people’s data and attention, even as it undermines serious journalism and polarises debate in society and political life.

When facts become optional and trust disappears, we will no longer be able to hold power to account. We need a public sphere where fostering trust with a healthy exchange of ideas is valued more highly than corporate profits and where rigorous journalism can cut through the noise.

Many governments around the world have exploited these platforms’ greed to grab and consolidate power. That is why they also attack and muzzle the free press. Clearly, these governments cannot be trusted to address this crisis. But nor should we put our rights in the hands of technology companies’ intent on sustaining a broken business model that actively promotes disinformation, hate speech and abuse.

The resulting toxic information ecosystem is not inevitable. Those in power must do their part to build a world that puts human rights, dignity, and security first, including by safeguarding scientific and journalistic methods and tested knowledge. To build that world, we must:

Bring an end to the surveillance-for-profit business model

The invisible ‘editors’ of today’s information ecosystem are the opaque algorithms and recommender systems built by tech companies that track and target us. They amplify misogyny, racism, hate, junk science and disinformation – weaponizing every societal fault line with relentless surveillance to maximize “engagement”. This surveillance-for-profit business model is built on the con of our supposed consent. But forcing us to choose between allowing platforms and data brokers to feast on our personal data or being shut out from the benefits of the modern world is simply no choice at all. The vast machinery of corporate surveillance not only abuses our right to privacy, but allows our data to be used against us, undermining our freedoms and enabling discrimination.

This unethical business model must be reined in globally, including by bringing an end to surveillance advertising that people never asked for and of which they are often unaware. Europe has made a start, with the Digital Services and Digital Markets Acts. Now these must be enforced in ways that compel platforms to de-risk their design, detox their algorithms and give users real control. Privacy and data rights, to date largely notional, must also be properly enforced. And advertisers must use their money and influence to protect their customers against a tech industry that is actively harming people.

End tech discrimination and treat people everywhere equally

Global tech companies afford people unequal rights and protection depending on their status, power, nationality, and language. We have seen the painful and destructive consequences of tech companies’ failure to prioritize the safety of all people everywhere equally. Companies must be legally required to rigorously assess human rights risks in every country they seek to expand in, ensuring proportionate language and cultural competency. They must also be forced to bring their closed-door decisions on content moderation and algorithm changes into the light and end all special exemptions for those with the most power and reach. These safety, design, and product choices that affect billions of people cannot be left to corporations to decide. Transparency and accountability rules are an essential first step to reclaiming the internet for the public good.

Rebuild independent journalism as the antidote to tyranny

Big tech platforms have unleashed forces that are devastating independent media by swallowing up online advertising while simultaneously enabling a tech-fueled tsunami of lies and hate that drown out facts. For facts to stand a chance, we must end the amplification of disinformation by tech platforms. But this alone is not enough. Just 13% of the world’s population can currently access a free press. If we are to hold power to account and protect journalists, we need unparalleled investment in a truly independent media persevering in situ or working in exile that ensures its sustainability while incentivizing compliance with ethical norms in journalism.

21st century newsrooms must also forge a new, distinct path, recognizing that to advance justice and rights, they must represent the diversity of the communities they serve. Governments must ensure the safety and independence of journalists who are increasingly being attacked, imprisoned, or killed on the frontlines of this war on facts.

We, as Nobel Laureates, from across the world, send a united message: together we can end this corporate and technological assault on our lives and liberties, but we must act now. It is time to implement the solutions we already have to rebuild journalism and reclaim the technological architecture of global conversation for all humanity.

We call on all rights-respecting democratic governments to:
1. Require tech companies to carry out independent human rights impact assessments that must be made public as well as demand transparency on all aspects of their business – from content moderation to algorithm impacts to data processing to integrity policies.


2. Protect citizens’ right to privacy with robust data protection laws.


3. Publicly condemn abuses against the free press and journalists globally and commit funding and assistance to independent media and journalists under attack.


We call on the EU to:
4. Be ambitious in enforcing the Digital Services and Digital Markets Acts so these laws amount to more than just ‘new paperwork’ for the companies and instead force them to make changes to their business model, such as ending algorithmic amplification that threatens fundamental rights and spreads disinformation and hate, including in cases where the risks originate outside EU borders.


5. Urgently propose legislation to ban surveillance advertising, recognizing this practice is fundamentally incompatible with human rights.


6. Properly enforce the EU General Data Protection Regulation so that people’s data rights are finally made reality.


7. Include strong safeguards for journalists’ safety, media sustainability and democratic guarantees in the digital space in the forthcoming European Media Freedom Act.


8. Protect media freedom by cutting off disinformation upstream. This means there should be no special exemptions or carve-outs for any organisation or individual in any new technology or media legislation. With globalised information flows, this would give a blank check to those governments and non-state actors who produce industrial scale disinformation to harm democracies and polarise societies everywhere.


9. Challenge the extraordinary lobbying machinery, the astroturfing campaigns and recruitment revolving door between big tech companies and European government institutions.


We call on the UN to:
10. Create a special Envoy of the UN Secretary-General focused on the Safety of Journalists (SESJ) who would challenge the current status quo and finally raise the cost of crimes against journalists.


Signed by:
Dmitry Muratov, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureate
Maria Ressa, 2021 Nobel Peace Prize laureate

Click here to see the full list of signatories.

Parliamentarians from Southeast Asia call for urgent action against the scourge of disinformation

Parliamentarians from Southeast Asia call for urgent action against the scourge of disinformation

MANILA – We, Parliamentarians from Southeast Asia, concerned with the spread of disinformation in our region and its deleterious effect on democracy and human rights, have visited the Philippines, often described as the “patient zero” of the disinformation pandemic, in order to study this phenomenon, meet stakeholders who have been victimized by it and seek effective ways to combat it.

ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) has conducted a Fact-finding Mission to the Philippines with two sitting members of parliament from Malaysia, Maria Chin Abdullah and Kelvin Yii Lee Wuen, and a former representative from Thailand, Pannika Wanich. The mission has served to throw light on the fact that disinformation not only endangers elections, but democracy at large.

Disinformation campaigns in the Philippines are often state-sanctioned, targeting members of the opposition, journalists, human rights defenders, and activists. 

These campaigns pose a direct threat to democracy because they are based in blanket accusations that generate extreme polarization by leveling down social complexities and imposing absolute dichotomies between enemies and friends, thus eliminating pluralism and the conditions for civilized dialogue, the cornerstones of a healthy democratic life. This has been shown clearly in the Philippines during the most recently held elections, when the widespread practice of “red-tagging”, accusations of links with the Communist insurgency, were used as weapons against political enemies, often leading to dire consequences.

“Disinformation often generates hatred, especially against vulnerable groups such as women. These campaigns are often strongly misogynistic, pandering to the worst societal prejudices against women and marginalized communities. The fight against disinformation is also the fight for equality and social justice, and civil society organizations fighting for the rights of women, LGBT communities and other vulnerable groups should play a prominent role in combating this problem,” said Ms. Chin Abdullah, also a member of APHR.

Disinformation thrives in environments where mainstream media, the traditional watchdog of those in power, has been widely discredited, and social media prevails as the main source of information. In the Philippines, 68% of the country’s population have regular access to the Internet, and there are over 92 million recorded social media users making the county a real battleground for disinformation. Filipinos are also more active on social media than their counterparts in any other Southeast Asian country, averaging 255 minutes of social media use per day.

The algorithms used by the social media giants generate “echo chambers” where users only find confirmation of their biases and are rarely exposed to contrasting opinions. In social media there are no journalistic standards, and opinions and facts mingle to the point of being indistinguishable. That makes the work of fact-checkers extremely important, but they can barely tackle the problem. As one of the participants said during a roundtable in our fact-finding mission, “fact-checking is five times slower than fake news.”

“The Philippine Parliament is urged to play an important role to investigate allegations of state-sanctioned disinformation campaigns and troll farms, and review or consider policies to monitor the social media giants and make them accountable while protecting people’s data privacy. But any legislation introduced as a way of tackling the disinformation pandemic should be limited and handled with extreme care, as it could be easily turned into censorship in the hands of authoritarian regimes, and it should never impinge on freedom of expression,” said Ms. Wanich.

Nevertheless, APHR welcomes initiatives to address the issue such as the formation of Task Force Kontra (Against) Fake News by the Philippine Commission on Elections (COMELEC). We urge them to ensure transparency and table the results of such efforts in Parliament and make the reports public. 

Throughout the fact-finding mission, it was often repeated that disinformation in the context of elections began long before the campaign period. It was revealed that organized and coordinated campaigns of political disinformation had been going on for years before the latest polls, amid a backdrop of impunity and censorship. When stakeholders started to take action against this phenomenon, there was a realization that it was already too late and the extent of disinformation had already been well-entrenched.

“The disinformation pandemic, in the Philippines and beyond, is too big to be addressed with piecemeal measures. It is necessary to find both a vaccine and a cure that work on a massive scale. The fight against disinformation must be part of national agendas everywhere with governments, civil society, and media rowing in the same direction. These agendas should include campaigns of voters’ education, media literacy programs, well-calibrated legislation, and fact-checking initiatives,” said Mr. Yii Lee Wuen.

Anggota parlemen Asia Tenggara meminta Indonesia untuk memberikan suara kepada Global South di G20

Anggota parlemen Asia Tenggara meminta Indonesia untuk memberikan suara kepada Global South di G20

JAKARTA – Anggota parlemen dari Asia Tenggara telah meminta Indonesia, satu-satunya anggota G20 di Asia Tenggara untuk menggunakan Presidensinya di G20 untuk “menyuarakan aspirasi Global Selatan” dan mengangkat isu-isu yang secara khusus mempengaruhi kawasan.

Dalam sebuah kertas posisi yang diterbitkan hari ini, Anggota Parlemen ASEAN untuk Hak Asasi Manusia (ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights, APHR) telah mendesak Indonesia untuk mengadvokasi dalam Pertemuan Puncak tanggapan global yang lebih kuat dan lebih kreatif terhadap kehancuran ekonomi yang disebabkan oleh konflik seperti yang terjadi di Myanmar, peningkatan substansial dalam dukungan keuangan global untuk transisi energi yang berkelanjutan, dan untuk menemukan cara mengurangi dampak transformasi digital dunia terhadap hak asasi manusia dan demokrasi.

“Indonesia ada dalam posisi di mana, berbeda dari yang lain, sebagai satu-satunya anggota G20 di Asia Tenggara dan negara demokrasi terbesar ketiga di dunia, dapat mewakili kepentingan dan aspirasi Global Selatan. Negara ini telah menunjukkan kepemimpinannya di ASEAN dan sekarang memiliki kesempatan untuk melakukannya di tingkat global, di mana ia dapat secara kreatif mencari solusi untuk tantangan yang, dengan gaungnya yang khas di kawasan kita, mempengaruhi umat manusia secara keseluruhan, ”kata Charles Santiago, Ketua APHR dan Anggota Parlemen di Malaysia.

APHR berpendapat bahwa cara-cara kreatif baru diperlukan untuk menanggapi biaya manusia dan ekonomi dari krisis seperti yang menghancurkan Myanmar, Ukraina, Yaman atau Suriah, mulai dari kenaikan harga komoditas, kekurangan pasokan pangan dan energi, hingga meningkatnya perdagangan manusia dan produksi serta perdagangan obat-obatan terlarang dan senjata. Karena organisasi internasional seperti PBB, atau kelompok-kelompok regional seperti ASEAN, seringkali gagal memitigasi dan menanggapi dampak ekonomi dari krisis semacam itu, Indonesia harus mengusulkan sebuah Kelompok Kerja baru di G20 guna membahas respon dari perekonomian terbesar di dunia ini.

Berhadapan dengan perubahan iklim, telah terbukti bahwa janji saat ini dari negara-negara untuk mengurangi emisi karbon tidak akan cukup melambatkan perubahan iklim, dan kebutuhan untuk beralih ke sumber energi terbarukan menjadi lebih mendesak dari sebelumnya. APHR mendesak Indonesia untuk memimpin G20 menyetujui percepatan penghentian penggunaan batu bara dan bahan bakar fosil, tetapi juga harus secara substansial meningkatkan dukungan keuangan global untuk transisi tersebut.

Terakhir, berhadapan dengan tantangan akibat kampanye disinformasi, perpecahan dan ujaran kebencian yang tesebar secara daring, APHR mendesak G20 untuk membahas dan mengidentifikasi langkah-langkah yang dapat diadopsi untuk mengatur pasar digital agar sejalan dengan demokrasi, mengakhiri penggunaan data pribadi orang yang invasif, dan meminta pertanggungjawaban platform daring atas model bisnis mereka yang berbahaya.

Klik di sini untuk membaca kertas posisi.

Anggota parlemen Asia Tenggara meminta Indonesia untuk memberikan suara kepada Global South di G20

Southeast Asian MPs call Indonesia to give a voice to the Global South at the G20

JAKARTA – Parliamentarians from Southeast Asia have called Indonesia, the only G20 member in Southeast Asia and its President this year, to “give voice to the aspirations of the Global South” and bring to the table issues that particularly affect the region, but also the world in general, at the group’s Summit which will be held in November this year in Jakarta.

In a position paper published today, ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) has urged Indonesia to advocate at the Summit for stronger and more creative global responses to the devastation caused by conflicts like that of Myanmar, a substantial increase in global financial support for a sustainable energy transition, and to find ways to reduce the impact of the world’s digital transformation on human rights and democracy.

We, Parliamentarians from Southeast Asia, are urging the Indonesian Government to use its preeminent position to promote at the G20 a form of collective and inclusive collaboration among nations to address challenges that, having a specific resonance to our region, affect humanity as a whole,” said APHR in the Position Paper.

APHR suggests that new creative ways are necessary to prevent the human and economic costs of crises such as those devastating Myanmar, Ukraine, Yemen or Syria. As international organizations like the UN, or regional groups like ASEAN, have often failed to prevent atrocities, Indonesia should propose a new Working Group at the G20 to discuss responses from the largest economies in the world to those crises.

On the climate change front, it has become evident that current pledges from states to reduce carbon emissions will not be sufficient to slow climate change, and the necessity to transition to renewable sources of energy is more urgent than ever. APHR urges Indonesia to lead the G20 to agree to accelerate the phasing out from coal and fossil fuels, but it must also substantially increase global financial support for such a transition.

Lastly, and in face of the challenges posed by the spread online of disinformation campaigns, divisiveness and hate-speech, APHR urges the G20 to discuss and identify measures that can be adopted to regulate the digital marketplace along democratic lines, put an end to invasive use of people’s personal data, and hold online platforms accountable for their harmful business models.

Click here to read the position paper.