Regional MPs call for immediate release of Cambodian refugees deported from Thailand

Regional MPs call for immediate release of Cambodian refugees deported from Thailand

Click here to read a Khmer version of this statement

Click here to read a Thai version of this statement

JAKARTA – Southeast Asian lawmakers have called for the immediate release of two Cambodian activists who were deported from Thailand this week, despite being registered as refugees by the United Nations High Commissioners on Refugees (UNHCR) in Bangkok. 

On the evening of 8 November, Thai authorities apprehended Voeun Veasna and Voeung Samnang, both part of the disbanded opposition political party the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), near their apartment in Bangkok, and deported them to Cambodia the next day. The pair are now detained in Phnom Penh’s Prey Sar (CC1) Prison.

“It is a deplorable act to send back refugees into the very hands of those who caused them to flee their homes. Sending the pair back to Cambodia puts them at risk of torture and abuse,” said Maria Chin Abdullah, a Member of ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR), a Malaysian Member of Parliament (MP). “We have seen an alarming recent trend in the region of authoritarian regimes trading political dissidents in order to threaten them and silence their voices. As we’ve said previously, such acts risk turning our region into an authoritarian’s playground, where no critics are safe.”

Veasna and Samnang’s deportation occurred after Cambodia’s Prime Minister Hun Sen ordered the arrest of Veasna over a critical poem he had posted on his Facebook page calling the country’s premier a “traitor” for amending Cambodia’s constitution, and thereby  “destroying the country”.

Both Veasna and Samnang arrived in Thailand in 2020 as exiles after facing political persecution in Cambodia for their association with the CNRP, which was dissolved by a Supreme Court in 2017 for allegedly attempting to overthrow the government. Rights groups, including APHR, have called the decision politically-motivated due to the significant gains the CNRP made against the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) in commune-level elections held that year.

While Thailand is not a signatory to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, it is not exempt from protecting individuals seeking refuge inside its borders. The authorities are still bound to respect the principle of non-refoulement.  Returning people where they are at risk of serious human rights violations goes against international law, APHR said. 

This is not the first time Thailand has deported activists. In 2019, a Vietnamese blogger disappeared from a Bangkok mall before re-emerging in a Vietnam prison, while a year later Thailand forcibly returned a Cambodian who fled to avoid prosecution, after a video was shared on social media showing her throwing a shoe at an image of Prime Minister Hun Sen. In 2020, Wanchalearm Satsaksit, a prominent Thai political activist and satirist living in exile in Cambodia, was reportedly abducted in broad daylight by a group of armed men in Phnom Penh. Wanchalearm, accused of computer-related crime in Thailand for operating a Facebook page that was critical of the Thai government, has not been seen since. 

APHR appeals to fellow parliamentarians in both Thailand and Cambodia to call for the release of Voeun Veasna and Voeung Samnan, and ensure they are free from persecution. The international community should make their voices heard to the Thai government that it is unacceptable to return a refugee to a country where they are likely to face persecution, and call on the Cambodian government to end all forms of harassment against individuals voicing critical opinion in exercise of their right to freedoms of expression.

“Human rights and democracy in the region are in critical danger, especially when governments collaborate to silence individuals simply for exercising their freedoms of expression. At a time when ASEAN requires leadership that works on behalf of the people, not despotic rulers, it is alarming to hear Prime Minister Hun Sen declaring yet another crackdown on dissent, particularly as Cambodia assumes the ASEAN chairmanship,” Abdullah said. 

Cambodia: No Justice At 5-Year Anniversary of Kem Ley’s Death

Cambodia: No Justice At 5-Year Anniversary of Kem Ley’s Death

Today, in advance of the fifth anniversary of the unlawful killing of prominent political commentator and human rights defender Kem Ley, the 45 undersigned organizations reiterate their call for the Cambodian authorities to create an independent Commission of Inquiry tasked with conducting an independent, impartial and effective investigation into Kem Ley’s death.

To date, the Cambodian government has consistently failed to achieve justice for Kem Ley and his family.

On 10 July 2016, against a backdrop of escalating attacks on civil society and the political opposition in the country, Kem Ley was shot in a café at a petrol station in central Phnom Penh.

Police quickly arrested Oeuth Ang – who inexplicably identified himself as “Choub Samlab” or “Meet to Kill” – as he fled the scene. According to police, the suspect “confessed” to the killing and claimed his motive was an unpaid debt of US$3000 Kem Ley owed him, a claim disputed by Kem Ley’s widow and Oeuth Ang’s wife.

On 23 March 2017, after a half-day trial hearing, the Phnom Penh Municipal Court found Oeuth Ang guilty of the murder of Kem Ley and sentenced him to life imprisonment. To date, there has been no independent, impartial and effective investigation to establish whether anyone else was involved in the killing. On 24 May 2019, Cambodia’s Supreme Court rejected Oeuth Ang’s appeal for reduction of sentence and upheld his life imprisonment term.

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch have previously highlighted key aspects of the case that have not been adequately investigated, and were not adequately addressed at trial. The failure to address such deficiencies raises concerns about prosecutors’ priorities to secure a quick conviction rather than comprehensively investigating the case, including uncovering information about other possible conspirators who may have been involved.

In light of these failings, the conduct of the investigation cannot credibly be said to have been thorough, independent, impartial or effective as required by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which Cambodia is a party, and the revised Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016).

Pursuant to the ICCPR, Cambodia has a duty to promptly, independently, impartially, and effectively investigate all deaths suspected of being unlawful. Investigations must seek to identify not only direct perpetrators but also all others who may have been responsible for criminal conduct in connection with the death.

Background

The deficiencies that were not adequately addressed at trial include: The accused’s implausible explanation regarding an alleged unpaid US$3,000 loan payment by Kem Ley which Oeuth Ang claims led to the shooting; the failure to interview a witness named by the accused to corroborate his story; the production in court of video footage from only one of several CCTV cameras at the petrol station likely to have captured the event; the failure of investigators to attempt to identify a man seen sitting with Kem Ley prior to the shooting; the failure of investigators to attempt to identify an individual the accused claimed fired a weapon at him as he was fleeing the scene of the crime; the failure of investigators to locate and interview the alleged seller of the murder weapon; the failure of investigators to look into the accused’s background and possible ties to the military; and the failure to
account for the identity of individuals, one of them apparently armed, seen in video footage pursuing the accused as he fled the crime scene.

The human rights record of modern Cambodia has been plagued by impunity. In the report released by the ICJ in 2017 highlighted that the lack of accountability in Cambodia was inextricably linked to the Government’s effective control of the judiciary.

On the fifth anniversary of his killing, we demand justice for Kem Ley.

Signed:

  1. Amnesty International
  2. Article 19
  3. ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR)
  4. Asian Democracy Network (ADN)
  5. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)
  6. Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL)
  7. Building and Wood Workers Trade Union Federation of Cambodia (BWTUC)
  8. Cambodian Alliance of Trade Unions (CATU)
  9. Cambodian Center for Human Rights (CCHR)
  10. Cambodian Food and Service Workers Federation (CFSWF)
  11. Cambodian Human Rights Action Coalition (CHRAC)
  12. Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)
  13. Cambodian Informal Economic Workers Association (CIWA)
  14. Cambodia Informal Economy Reinforce Association (CIERA)
  15. Cambodian Institute for Democracy (CID)
  16. Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)
  17. Cambodian Tourism Workers Union Federation (CTWUF)
  18. Cambodian Youth Network Association (CYN)
  19. Cambodia’s Independent Civil Servants Association (CICA)
  20. Center for Alliance of Labor and Human Rights (CENTRAL)
  21. Centre for Civil and Political Rights (CCPR Centre)
  22. CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation
  23. Civil Rights Defenders
  24. Coalition for Integrity and Social Accountability (CISA)
  25. Coalition of Cambodian Apparel Workers’ Democratic Union (C.CAWDU)
  26. Coalition of Cambodian Farmers Community (CCFC)
  27. Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL)
  28. Equitable Cambodia
  29. Free Independent Trade Union Federation (FUFI)
  30. Human Rights Watch
  31. Independent Democracy of Informal Economy Association (IDEA)
  32. Independent Trade Union Federation (INTUFE)
  33. Initiativ Kambodja
  34. International Commission of Jurists
  35. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), within the framework of the
    Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
  36. Labour Right Supported Union Khmer Employee of Nagaworld (L.R.S.U)
  37. Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada (LRWC)
  38. Mother Nature Cambodia
  39. Not1More (N1M)
  40. People Center for Development and Peace (PDP-CENTER)
  41. The Affiliated Network for Social Accountability (ANSA) Cambodia
  42. Transparency International Cambodia (TI-C)
  43. Union Coalition of Labor (UCL)
  44. World Organization Against Torture (OMCT), within the framework of the
    Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
  45. Youth Resource Development Program (YRDP)
Cambodia: Stop silencing critical commentary on COVID-19

Cambodia: Stop silencing critical commentary on COVID-19

We, the undersigned international human rights organizations, call on the Cambodian government to immediately stop its assault on freedom of expression in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. In recent months, the government has warned against public criticism of its actions, prevented independent journalists from reporting on the pandemic, prosecuted individuals for criticizing the inoculation campaign, and threatened journalists and social media users with legal actions on the spurious grounds of provoking “turmoil in society.”

While Cambodia was spared from high numbers of severe COVID-19 cases in 2020, beginning in February 2021 there has been a spike in cases to which the government responded with disproportionate and unnecessary measures in violation of Cambodia’s international human rights obligations. This includes a campaign against freedom of expression that further constricts media freedom and promotes fear and self-censorship in the country. These measures serve to undermine, not advance, efforts to stop the spread of COVID-19.

The Cambodian authorities placed a de facto ban on independent reporting in Phnom Penh’s red zones—areas deemed to be high risk for COVID-19 transmission. On 3 May 2021, the Ministry of Information announced that only state media or journalists invited by the government would be permitted to report from red zones. The next day, the Ministry of Information issued a letter warning journalists not to disseminate information that could “provoke turmoil in society” and threatening legal action against those who disobey. The letter followed viral livestream footage from multiple Facebook news outlets of long queues of COVID-19 patients outside government treatment centres.

The government’s campaign to silence critical commentary has extended beyond journalists to ordinary people, in a manner incompatible with international human rights standards.

In a press release dated 1 May 2021, the Government Spokesperson Unit demanded the immediate cessation of social media posts intended to “provoke and create chaos” in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, referring to such posts as “acts of attack” that must be punished. The press release concluded by praising the efforts of government officials to curb the spread of COVID-19 but did not provide any legal justification for imposing these possible restrictions on the right to freedom of expression.

On 30 April 2021, Kandal provincial authorities warned farmers in Sa’ang district not to post images of vegetables spoiling in their fields due to the closure of markets, stating that such communications are bad for morale. One farmer, Tai Song, was pressured by the provincial authorities to sign a document agreeing not to post such content again after he shared a photo on Facebook showing his vegetables rotting and stating that he had to clear and throw away his crops.

The Cambodian authorities have arrested dozens of individuals for expressing critical opinions about the government’s COVID-19 response, including at least six individuals for their criticism of the government’s vaccination campaign. One Chinese journalist, Shen Kaidong, was subsequently deported for publishing a story deemed ‘fake news’ in which multiple Chinese nationals reported receiving a text offering them the Sinopharm vaccine for a service fee.

Authorities have also prosecuted at least three individuals—Korng Sambath, Nov Kloem, and Pann Sophy—for posting TikTok videos criticising the use of Chinese-made vaccines under the new, overly broad and vague Law on Measures to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19 and other Serious, Dangerous and Contagious Diseases (the COVID-19 Law).

These actions are consistent with the government’s systematic and relentless crackdown on freedom of expression and information spanning far beyond the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. This latest surge contributes to the government’s broader efforts to silence all critical voices in Cambodia.

The right to freedom of expression is protected by Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Cambodia acceded in 1992, and by Article 41 of Cambodia’s Constitution.

Protecting public health is the grounds on which the government is purporting to restrict freedom of expression. While there is a legitimate need to counter the spread of misinformation online to protect public health during a pandemic, this objective must be provided by a clear and accessible law and pursued using the least intrusive means, rather than unnecessary and disproportionate measures like unwarranted arrests, detentions, and criminal prosecutions.

In its General Comment 34, the UN Human Rights Committee emphasized the essential role of the media in informing the public and stated that “in circumstances of public debate concerning public figures … the value placed [on] uninhibited expression is particularly high.” A 2017 Joint Declaration of four independent experts on freedom of expression stressed that “general prohibitions on the dissemination of information based on vague and ambiguous ideas” are incompatible with international human rights standards.

The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights emphasised in General Comment 14 that the protection of freedom of expression is a key component of the right to health—enshrined in Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—enabling vital information collected by the public and journalists to reach policymakers. We therefore strongly condemn the Cambodian government’s efforts to inhibit the free flow of information relevant to the pandemic. Such actions will negatively impact the quality and reliability of news reporting and undermine the government’s own ability to respond to COVID-19.

Open dialogue and robust investigative journalism are critical during times of crisis, including public health emergencies. The Special Rapporteur on the right to health has emphasized the crucial role of the media in ensuring accountability in health systems. During a pandemic, free and independent media can help identify viral hotspots or outbreaks, monitor national and international responses, and promote transparency and accountability in the delivery of necessary public health services.

The Cambodian government’s clampdown on free speech is having a chilling effect on the exercise of freedom of expression in Cambodia. The authorities’ actions are reinforcing the already widespread atmosphere of self-censorship, preventing participation in governance and public affairs, and extinguishing an important safeguard for government accountability.

We therefore call on the Cambodian government to end the harassment of independent journalists reporting on COVID-19 and individuals who voice critical opinions or fears about the pandemic on social media platforms and to take steps to ensure a free, independent, and diverse media environment. We urge the Cambodian authorities to substantially amend or repeal the new COVID-19 Law and other non-human rights compliant legislation that criminalise or unduly restrict freedom of expression and information. The Cambodian government should uphold the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive and impart information instead of using a public health crisis as an excuse to extinguish dissent.

This statement is endorsed by:

1. Access Now

2. Amnesty International

3. ARTICLE 19

4. ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR)

5. Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA)

6. CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation

7. Human Rights Watch

8. International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)

9. International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)

10.  International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX)

11.  Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

12.  World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT)

Cambodia must drastically change its COVID-19 approach, MPs say

Cambodia must drastically change its COVID-19 approach, MPs say

JAKARTA – Regional lawmakers have today sounded the alarm over the Cambodian government’s disproportionate and excessive measures in response to COVID-19, and urged it to provide relief to those in need and to adopt a comprehensive approach that places human rights at its center. 

Amid the rise of COVID-19 cases this year, Cambodia has introduced a slew of harsh laws, sub-decrees, and other measures to curb the spread of the virus, including by imposing heavy criminal penalties against those who violate them. Strict lockdown measures have also severely affected some residents’ access to basic necessities such as food, and have been enforced with violence by the police. Meanwhile dozens of people have been arrested or received arrest warrants on incitement charges for criticizing the government’s response to the pandemic, including opposition leader Sam Rainsy.

While the government has an obligation to prevent the further spread of COVID-19, its measures must be necessary and proportionate to the threats posed by the virus. What we are seeing however is a government that is issuing threats and violence and pushing people further into hunger,” said France Castro, member of ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR) and a Philippine Member of Parliament (MP).

For example, the Law on Measures to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19 and Other Serious, Dangerous and Contagious Diseases allows authorities to restrict travel, gatherings, demonstrations, and business operations or professional activities. Offenders under this law can be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison and fined 20 million riels (US$5,000). According to human rights group LICADHO, at least 258 people were arrested under the COVID-19 Law between 10 and 25 April and fined, sent to quarantine centers and/or sent to court.  

Twenty years in prison for not respecting a travel ban or for taking part in a demonstration is totally excessive. The pandemic should not be used as an excuse by the government to impose dictatorial and anti-democratic rules,” said Wong Chen, APHR member and a Malaysian MP.

In addition, the lockdown measures imposed in specific areas known as “red zone” in Phnom Penh have reportedly cut off food supplies for tens of thousands who are now in dire need of aid. These restrictions, which ban residents from leaving their homes unless for medical reasons, initially saw the government commit to providing food and water, but it has since said they will be selling products instead. Garment workers, who rely on daily wages and have not been able to work, have been especially affected as many clothing factories are located within this high-risk infection zone.

The government has since extended the lockdown until 5 May. 

The very same people the government is supposed to protect are now most at risk of severe financial hardship. For a successful recovery from this crisis, the government has to be compassionate and not be cruel. The government should focus on access to food, protection of jobs via a wage subsidy scheme, and larger welfare and fiscal spending. By empowering people with more rights and protection, the people will become more resilient and productive and this in turn will positively contribute to a full recovery from the pandemic,” said Wong.

Open Letter: Supporting the Cambodian Land Grabbing case

Open Letter: Supporting the Cambodian Land Grabbing case

To:
Ms Fatou Bensouda,
The Prosecutor,
International Criminal Court
Den Haag
Netherlands

Open Letter: Supporting the Cambodian Land Grabbing Case

Dear Madam Prosecutor,

In your 17 February 2021 speech to the Institute of International and European Affairs, you confirmed that your Office will soon take a decision on the pending Cambodian land grabbing situation, which you already referred to in your December 2020 report on preliminary examinations activities. This is extremely welcome news. We offer our strong support for positive action on this case.

The Cambodia situation offers a unique opportunity for the ICC to engage with the single greatest threat facing humankind – the climate and environmental emergency. Land grabbing is not only about the violent forced evictions of residents, or the beatings, murders, or unlawful imprisonment of land activists. In many countries around the world, land grabbing is the harbinger for illegal resource exploitation, persecution of indigenous people, and environmental destruction. Putting the brakes on illegal land grabbing will help protect the environment and combat climate change.

As demonstrated in Article 15 Communications, filed in 2014 and 2015 by Richard J Rogers of Global Diligence LLP with the support of FIDH and Global Witness, evidence suggests that the mass crimes associated with land grabbing in Cambodia amount to a widespread or systematic attack against poor Cambodians. Hundreds of thousands of people have been forcibly displaced, including a significant proportion of the minority indigenous population. This has laid the ground for an environmental catastrophe – over a quarter of Cambodia’s ancient rainforests have been destroyed during the ICC’s short lifetime.

Pursuing the Cambodia situation would send a crucial message to would-be violators globally that, in the most extreme cases, the crimes associated with land grabbing may amount to crimes against humanity. Politicians and businesspeople alike would have to re-think practices that cause mass human harm and environmental degradation.

Madam Prosecutor, merely by opening a full examination into the situation in Cambodia, your Office can start to play a meaningful role in tackling the climate and environmental crisis, consistent with your 2016 policy on case selection and prioritization. This is your chance to support the rights of future generations.


Patrick Alley, Co-Founder, Global Witness
Eléonore Morel, CEO, FIDH
Richard J Rogers, Executive Director, Climate Counsel


This Open Letter is supported by the following UN Experts, civil society organisations, and individuals. (For security reasons, we have not included Cambodian-based organisations).

United Nations Experts:

  1. UN Working Group on the use of mercenaries, Ms. Jelena Aparac (ChairRapporteur), Ms. Lilian Bobea, Mr. Chris Kwaja, Mr. Ravindran Daniel, and Ms. Sorcha MacLeod.

    Organisations:
  2. Africa Europe Faith Justice Network (AEFJN), Belgium
  3. Alternative ASEAN Network on Burma, Burma
  4. Al-Haq, Palestine
  5. Amazon Frontlines, Ecuador, Mitchell Anderson, Executive Director
  6. ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights, Southeast Asia, (HQ: Jakarta)
  7. Association Marocaine des Droits Humains (AMDH), Morocco
  8. Australian Earth Laws Alliance, Australia, Dr Michelle Maloney, National Convenor
  9. Avocats sans frontières (ASF)
  10. Cambodia Democratic Council, USA, Vibol Touch, Founder
  11. Center for International Environmental Law, USA, Carroll Muffett, President & CEO
  12. Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), USA
  13. Centro de Políticas Públicas y Derechos (Equidad), Peru
  14. Comisiόn De Derechos Humanos De El Salvador, El Salvador
  15. Corporate Responsibility Coalition (CORE), UK
  16. Diakonia, Sweden
  17. Earth Law Center, United States, Canada and Mexico, Grant Wilson, Executive Director
  18. Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights, Egypt
  19. FIAN International, Switzerland
  20. Finnish League for Human Rights, Finland
  21. Focus on the Global South
  22. Forum-Asia
  23. Greenpeace International, Netherlands, Charlie Holt, Legal Counsel (Campaigns
    and Action)
  24. Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Pakistan
  25. Indigenous People’s Rights International, Philippines, Joan Carling, Co-Founder
  26. International Partnership for Human Rights, Belgium, Simon Papuashvili, Program Director
  27. INTERPRT, Norway, Nabil Ahmed, Founder and Director
  28. Justice for Iran, Iran
  29. Latvian Human Rights Committee, Latvia
  30. Ligue des Droits de l’Homme et du Citoyen, France
  31. Ligue des Droits de l’Homme en Iran, Iran
  32. Maldivian Democracy Network, Maldives
  33. Mouvement Laotien pour les Droits de l’Homme, Laos
  34. Narasha Community Development Group, Kenya
  35. Not1More, UK, Fran Lambrick, Co-Founder
  36. Odhikar, Bangladesh
  37. Programa Venezolano de Educación – Acción en Derechos Humanos (PROVEA), Venezuela
  38. Promise Institute for Human Rights, UCLA School of Law, USA, Kate Mackintosh, Executive Director
  39. Sisters’ Arabic Forum for Human Rights (SAF), Yeman
  40. Stop Ecocide Foundation, Netherlands, Jojo Mehta, Chair & International Director
  41. Vietnam Committee on Human Rights & Que Me: Action for Democracy in Vietnam, Vietnam
  42. Wild and Legal, France, Marine Calmet, President
  43. Women’s Initiatives for Gender Justice (WIGJ), Netherlands
  44. Women’s Rights Action Watch Asia Pacific

    Individuals:
  45. Barrett, Nicole, Director, International Justice and Human Rights Clinic, Allard
    School of Law, University of British Columbia and former UN Prosecutor (ICTY)
  46. Batesmith, Alex, Law Lecturer, University of Leeds, UK, and former UN Prosecutor
    (ECCC)
  47. Robinson, Darryl, Professor at Queens University, Canada, and former Advisor to
    ICC Prosecutor
  48. Heather Ryan, Former court monitor (OSJI) at ECCC, USA
  49. Schromen-Wawrin, Lindsey, City Council Member, Port Angeles, Washington,
    USA
  50. Toussaint, Marie, MEP, Green Member of the European Parliament, France
  51. Work, Courtney, Assistant Professor, National Chengchi University, Taiwan